Search for: "Battle v. State" Results 4101 - 4120 of 8,278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2012, 2:29 pm by Leanne Buckley-Thomson
The support of Strasbourg jurisprudence was noted, in particular  the cases of Sergey Kuznetsov v Russia [2008] ECHR 1170, Lucas v UK (App No 39013/02) 18 March 2003, and Appleby v UK (App No 44306/98). [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
 | When passing off is enough to successfully oppose a trade mark |  BREAKING: Sky's the limit for CJEU references in Sky v SkyKick trade mark battle |  Influencers and undisclosed sponsored activities: where do we stand? [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 4:46 am
Ct. 2653 (2011), protecting promotional communications as commercial speech; next, the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
Bork’s opponents were critical of his opinions about the Supreme Court’s Roe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:01 am
The Second Circuit Pushes Back In Jock Last year, the Second Circuit continued what seems to be a running battle with the Supreme Court regarding arbitration clauses in Jock v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:01 am
The Second Circuit Pushes Back In Jock Last year, the Second Circuit continued what seems to be a running battle with the Supreme Court regarding arbitration clauses in Jock v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 6:53 pm by Amy Howe
  Let’s talk about today’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
The article has been cited in papers submitted to the United States Supreme Court in the upcoming case of Stolt-Nielsen SA v. [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:06 pm by Old Fox
A MOJWA spokesman stated that 40 MNLA troops had been taken prisoner.[8][9]The MNLA's Azawad Vice President Mahamadou Djeri Maïga acknowledged that they lost control of the city but said that the fight would continue. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm by Erin Miller
Creech (1993)), let States limit the uses juries make of mitigation (Graham v. [read post]