Search for: "Doe 35" Results 4101 - 4120 of 17,233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2014, 9:18 am
The district court held the asserted claims invalid because they cover subject matter ineligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:08 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The OPM does keep records on complaints filed by racial/ethnic groups while APD Internal Affairs does not because the software being utilized does not allow retrieval of data based on specific queries. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:00 am by Marcel Pemsel
The Polish court wondered whether Artt. 34, 35 and 36 TFEU would prevent Hewlett Packard from enforcing its trade mark rights given the circumstances of the case. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:25 pm
 Network Signatures, at *5-6.Unintentional DelaysPayment Delay, Generally"Acceptance of late payment of maintenance fees is authorized by statute, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 8:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
"Prescriber" does not include a licensee who is an employee, as defined in N.J.A.C.18:35-7.1, of a pharmaceutical manufacturer who does not provide patient care. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Pursuant to § 355(j)(2)(B), the ANDAdefendants notified Shire of the Paragraph IV certifications.In response, Shire sued the ANDA defendants forinfringing the asserted claims, along with certain otherclaims not at issue in this appeal, under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm by Arthur F. Coon
” Therefore, according to the Court, “[i]t follows that filing a notice of exemption before project approval [is invalid and] does not begin the running of the 35-day limitations period set forth in [Public Resources Code ] section 21167, subdivision (d). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:28 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
People may be joint inventors even though they do not physically work on the invention together or at the same time, and even though each does not make the same type or amount of contribution. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
L.No. 98-622, 98 Stat. 3383 (codified at 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:33 pm
Open E Cry, LLC, No. 2012-1583 (August 30, 2013).Issue(s)[1-2] "[W]hether the claims of the ’411 patent[, a continuation, and the '055 patent, a CIP,] satisfied the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 11:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” “It is generally true that the sale of real estate, of itself, does not constitute a good or service. [read post]