Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 19,138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2017, 5:30 am
§ 2000e et seq.,] and New York State's Human Right Law [Executive Law Article 15].The United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, found a triable issue of fact with respect to Zarda's contention that Altitude was in of violation of New York law but granted summary judgment to Altitude with respect to Zarda's Title VII claim. [read post]
26 Apr 2025, 9:10 am
Hartwell and the 1888 case United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 3:32 am
Ali Zaki Mousa v Secretary of State for Defence & Anr [2011] EWCA Civ 133 - read judgment Philip Havers QC of 1 Crown Office Row represented the respondent secretary of state in this case. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 7:21 pm
Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:39 pm
Padilla v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:51 pm
Finally, I’ve considered whether our reservation to the International Covenant, specifically saying that “Article 20 does not authorize or require legislation or other action by the United States that would restrict the right of free speech and association protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States,” provides us with a loophole: The theory would be that the proposal only commits states to “take effective measures,… [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 8:58 pm
Lara Schwartz of the Human Rights Campaign, and Mr. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 1:06 pm
Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm
Facility v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:41 am
The Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals tackled that somewhat messy issue with its recent decision and order in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 2:38 pm
Copyright Office released Part 2 of its report, Copyright and Artificial Intelligence: Copyrightability (“the 2025 Report”) providing a detailed legal and policy analysis of how copyright law applies to AI-generated content.[1] Part 2 builds on foundational principles of copyright law, reaffirming that human authorship remains the cornerstone of copyright protection in the United States.[2] It provides critical guidance on the conditions under which AI-assisted works… [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 12:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
Infringement - The de minimis principle in quia timet actionsThe de minimis principle has been considered in previous patent authorities (Hoechst v BP [1998], Monsanto v Cargill [2007], Napp v Ratiopharm [2009], Lundbeck v Norpharma [2011]). [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:15 pm
Vincent Forcier v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 4:24 pm
Faced with persistent unemployment, a nationwide foreclosure crisis, deep cuts to state and local budgets, and declining state support for public education, Americans are questioning the promise of upward mobility. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:08 pm
The Third Circuit noted that the United States Supreme Court, in the case of Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 3:43 pm
Arguments were heard last week by the Supreme Court in Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:56 am
On Wednesday, in State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
We agree with the defendant that the evidence at trial, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), was legally insufficient to establish that he acted with the culpable mental state of depraved indifference to human life at the time he collided with the complainants' vehicles and, thus, did not support his conviction of assault in the first degree (see Penal Law § 120.10[3]; People v Feingold, 7 NY3d… [read post]
