Search for: "People v. Bear"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 5,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2023, 9:39 am
While the amicus process has yet to bear significant fruit, taking even this small step to bring balance to the infamously one-sided FISC process is a good step. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 7:48 am
We have to deal with it and keep our bearings as all sorts of people try to sway our minds, Russian or not. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 12:02 pm
Q: Garcia v. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 6:19 am
Bar Assoc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
One of the more incredible allegations about Prenda Law, the copyright-trolling operation that sued people for downloading movies online, was that the lawyers behind Prenda and its associated companies might have created and uploaded some of the porn, simply as a way of catching more offenders. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
(This is not a judge whose decisions bear the stamp of impartiality -- the only words adequate to describe his judicial approach are "outcome-oriented. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 10:02 pm
Generally, the prosecution bears the burden of proof. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 5:43 am
” Yannas v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:03 pm
The individual defendants did not have to bear the cost of being unemployed, living in a foreign land and bearing all of the consequences of an “away” trial. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 7:25 am
AS AN ASIDE, IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE HIGHEST DAMAGE AWARD CASES IN TRADEMARKS TEND TO BE REVERSE CONFUSION CASES, BUT IN THOSE CASES, IT TENDS TO BE DAVID v GOLIATH. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:42 am
” Finally, David Kopel argues in the Washington Times that Justice Sotomayor’s recent dissent in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm
In Sir James Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB), Jay J declined to draw an such an inference of serious harm where the contested publication was in a national newspaper. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am
Pam Samuelson: legislative changes/courts v. legislators? [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am
Heymann: This is tied to TM as source indicator v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:18 pm
The statutory duty does not extend to every kind of activity that people engage in on the premises. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
Cohen v. [read post]
