Search for: "People v. House" Results 4101 - 4120 of 12,999
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2012, 5:41 am by Susan Brenner
He uses people, is into illegal activities, etc. [read post]
12 May 2023, 8:24 am by Neil H. Buchanan
"  A former governor here became a US senator who was a leader of the "massive resistance" movement against Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on last week’s decision in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
  The court appoints another attorney to pursue the issue… Exigent circumstances allowed the police to enter the defendant’s house without a warrant, the 5th District holds in State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” The editorial board of The Baltimore Sun argues that the case offers the court “an important opportunity to uphold the Constitution’s promise that the House (and by implication, state legislative bodies) reflect the changing will of the people, not the interests of incumbents or whatever party is in power when the lines are drawn. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
The first is in Seila Law v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court to strike down a new Mississippi law that lets government workers and business people cite their own religious objections to refuse services to LGBT people. [read post]
22 May 2019, 2:29 pm by Ad Law Defense
  Just ask the Los Angeles City Attorney after the recent decision by the California Court of Appeals in The People v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm by INFORRM
A report compiled by Freedom House has said that press freedom has declined to its lowest point in 12 years, and has drawn attention to the failings of European powers. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 3:41 pm by Harry Styron
Here’s how the Arkansas court of appeals looked at the case, DeSoto Gathering Co. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost maintains that “[p]olitical differences aside, a common-sense reading of Kavanaugh’s testimony shows that he is ready if confirmed to vote to overrule the abortion-rights decision Roe v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 6:34 am by David Zaring
The second is the fact that thousands of documents are being signed by people. [read post]