Search for: "Smith v. Judges" Results 4101 - 4120 of 5,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2019, 7:43 am by Dan Bressler
Southern District Judge Nelson Roman and Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman recently addressed two such issues in Barbini v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
There can be few judges who, having formed a provisionally adverse view on a skeleton argument advanced in support of a case, have not then found their view transformed by the subsequent oral argument for which, in the art of advocacy, there is no comparable substitute. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
There can be few judges who, having formed a provisionally adverse view on a skeleton argument advanced in support of a case, have not then found their view transformed by the subsequent oral argument for which, in the art of advocacy, there is no comparable substitute. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:21 pm by admin
The Department of Corrections’ own doctors diagnosed her with Gender Identity Disorder and the Seventh Circuit recently stated in Fields v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:11 am
This week's oral arguments before the Court of Appeals that will be webcast: This Monday, Oct. 1st: 10:00 AM - Smith and Wesson Corporation, et al v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
  Secondly, Associate Judge Smith delivered a lengthy judgment in a case brought by a New Plymouth doctor, wherein Fairfax’s novel defence of ‘public-interest qualified privilege’ was canvassed at length but, ultimately, struck out. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:23 pm
Justice Smith held [12]           On the issue of vehicle damage, I note the comments of Madam Justice Ballance in Robbie v. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 1:18 am by INFORRM
On the same day, there was an appeal hearing before Linden J in the harassment case of Smith v Poulton & others KA-2024-000084. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:47 am by Amy Howe
” In The National Law Journal (subscription or registration may be required), Catherine Smith and Susannah Pollvogt criticize a recent decision by a federal judge in Louisiana upholding that state’s ban on same-sex marriage, arguing that he “may not pick and choose among Supreme Court precedent to achieve a desired outcome. [read post]