Search for: "State v. Seven"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 11,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2018, 2:01 pm
Department of State; Assistant Secretary of State, Educational and Cultural Affairs. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:16 am
" Medlin v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:05 am
CJLF wrote an amicus brief in this case supporting Texas.It was no surprise in the case of Moore v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
Here, a telehealth practitioner may prescribe up to a 30-day supply of a schedule III-V non-narcotic controlled medication. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:31 am
Green Bay Co., 80 U.S. 166 (1872). [4] United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 9:13 am
This is the lowest level of support since 1972, the year the Supreme Court voided all existing state death penalty laws in Furman v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
The Ohio Supreme Court’s decision this week in State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
The parties separated in 2002, after living together for seven years. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:22 am
Twenty-seven states (most of which are controlled by Republicans) opted not to create their own exchanges. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:12 am
On January 13, 2017, just seven days before the inauguration of President Donald Trump, the Supreme Court granted the NLRB’s petition, along with two others filed by employers (Ernst & Young LLP v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 11:50 am
The ruling in C.T. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 11:34 am
On this Constitution Day, it is worth recalling that seven of the thirty-nine delegates to the Philadelphia convention whose names are affixed to the Constitution were foreign-born, i.e., born outside of the territories that became the United States. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:55 pm
He emphasized that, “in the real world,” warrants are not available twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:30 pm
Moore v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
The court rejected this argument, stating that to do what Plaintiffs asked would essentially restart substantial portions of the seven-year-old litigation. [read post]
