Search for: "U.S. v. Mark"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 11,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 1:05 pm
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 8:31 am
” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)); Salinger v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
”The U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:14 pm
U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 9:59 am
The main way to protect a trademark is by perfecting and maximizing one’s rights in the mark, which usually occurs by registering it with the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:45 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual PropertyFact, Confusion Issues Preclude Dismissal in Suit Alleging Infringement, Dilution of Mattress' Mark Dan-Foam A/S v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 12:27 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property No Likely Confusion Found Between Dissimilar Mark Incorporating 'Medici' Name Medici Classics Productions Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 1:18 am
Cigar Firm's Registration of 'Cohiba' Mark Empresa Cubana del Tabaco v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:10 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property'Air Cargo News' Is Generic Mark Without Secondary Meaning; Trademark Protection Not Warranted Air Cargo News Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 9:39 am
See Inwood, 456 U.S. at 854. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:46 am
Sabrina McCubbin posted the court documents from the consolidated cases under Dalmazzi v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 4:09 am
U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:08 am
See McGlaughlin, 486 U.S. at 134-35; see also Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
By Mark P. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:06 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Having recently marked the forty-fifth anniversary of the Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
There is a puzzling aspect to much of what emits from U.S. [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:18 pm
Lasting Impression I, Inc., 543 U.S. 111, 118? [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
. to cases where the issue is the adequacy of medical services”; legal malpractice case) (citation and quotation marks omitted); Marlin v. [read post]
