Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 6,867
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2012, 7:47 am
United States (2012), Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
In a sense, that’s not terribly surprising, since Judge David Hamilton had previously taken the same track (if less explicitly) in his previous opinion while still on a district court judge in Hofts v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 8:44 am
Facebook v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:07 pm
On Tuesday, November 1, Judges Millett, Rao, and Childs issued a per curiam order appointing David Casazza, of Gibson Dunn as amicus to present arguments in favor of the district court’s order in End Citizens United PAC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:43 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:43 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 11:49 am
The constitutional implications of mass quantities of data were at the heart of five Justices’ concurrences in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
David P. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
United States (1879) hung over the case of Brown v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am
Turning to the district court’s conclusion that the 2010 map also had a discriminatory effect, the challengers assert that several justices specifically envisioned an inquiry into whether a redistricting plan had a discriminatory effect in League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
Several patent-related cases, Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:40 am
Sheehan v. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Potential Blanket Legal Barriers Here is the text of Section 3: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any S [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 8:36 pm
An adventurous soul, Sharon took numerous camping trips and road trips across the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:24 am
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193, 97 S. [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm
United States The Verge had a piece on a group of Senate Republicans planning to introduce a privacy bill that would regulate the data collected by coronavirus contact tracing apps. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:09 am
Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital,[1] Douglas v. [read post]
