Search for: "Black v. Black" Results 4121 - 4140 of 12,695
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2020, 10:15 am by Dennis Crouch
The character has long been criticized as a stereotypical representation of black women as inferior servants. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 9:11 am by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Glenn v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:44 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) states: (b) During an Inquiry into the Validity of a Verdict or Indictment. (1) Prohibited Testimony or Other Evidence. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:25 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(6) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A statement offered against a party that wrongfully caused — or acquiesced in wrongfully causing — the declarant’s unavailability as a witness, and did so intending... [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 2:47 pm
  His primary example is a protest case in 1972 in which black students at a college forcibly surrounded some school administrators and led them across the campus (against their will) to talk to the college president. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
On 25 August 2023, the Court of Appeal Nicola Davies, Arnold and Warby LJJ) handed down judgment in Blake & ors v Fox [2023] EWCA Civ 1000. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:43 pm by Hans von Spakovsky
The general rule that the Supreme Court established in 1993 in yet another North Carolina case, Shaw v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm by Stuart Taylor
And, of course, the new decision makes a dead letter of the Court’s caveat in its 2003 Grutter v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:43 am
* Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic (but not distinctive) London black cabMr Justice Arnold addresses the issue of whether the iconic London cab can be a trade mark in The London Taxi Corporation Limited trading as the London Taxi Company v (1) Frazer-Nash Research Limited and (2) Ecotive Limited [2016] EWHC 52 (Ch). [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:14 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Supp. 2d184, 190 (D.D.C. 2013) (quoting BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY670 (9th ed. 2009)). [read post]