Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 4121 - 4140 of 15,515
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The figures were specifically denoted “estimates” on the Disclosure Statements, with an explanation of the effect of interest rate changes on monthly installment amounts explained in the fine print. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
  The complaint (full text) in United Federation of Churches LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 1:01 pm
  (I'm not certain that's what the Legislature intended, so maybe they'll be a fix, but at least for now, after today's decision, that'll be the rule going forward.)So if you've got a case that's worth less than six figures, and are worried about the defendant filing an anti-SLAPP motion (and potentially recovering fees and/or delaying the case with an appeal), maybe limit your recovery to $25,000 and file a limited civil action. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 2:49 pm by Elizabeth Kruska
This has got to be evidence of something.State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 11:47 am by Leonard Gordon and Evan Minsberg
In 2013, a group of retailers sued the New York Attorney General in the case Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 10:43 am by Daniel Hemel
How are you going to figure out which part of the award is subject to the [exemption]? [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 8:35 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  On September 27, 2018, the Kentucky Supreme Court, in Northern Kentucky Area Development District v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 3:02 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court entered its opinion in California Public Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 8:54 am by Joe Bamford (UK)
Figure 1 on page 16 provides an FCA assessment to determine fairness within price discrimination practices. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:35 am by Daniel Nazer
This writ was issued in Shipping and Transit, LLC v. 1A Auto, Inc., Case No. 9:16-cv-81039, in the Southern District of Florida. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am by Florian Mueller
I'll talk about the public-interest analysis again soon (from an antitrust angle), but for now I'd just like to show you (a) the initial determination and, below that one, (b) the ITC's call for public-interest statements (which are due by November 8; by coincidence, that's also the date of the next Qualcomm v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 3:52 am by petrocohen
Richard Gaeckle also has a Superb rating on AVVO and an A/V rating with Martindale-Hubbell, both of which are the highest possible ratings by the respective organizations. [read post]