Search for: "Fine v. Fine"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 16,010
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2019, 7:31 am
The Brunetti decision followed closely behind the Supreme Court’s Matal v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:00 am
Unanimous juries (like the ban on excessive fines) might be an easy case; but at some point we will need a theory.I was very excited to the see the Supreme Court agree to take up the constitutionality of non-unanimous jury verdicts in Ramos v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:33 pm
Conservatives v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:22 pm
Keller v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:22 pm
Keller v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 1:28 pm
Mientras la senadora Itzamar Peña resaltó que una de las mayores virtudes del Proyecto del Senado 1211 es la de proveer las herramientas a esas víctimas para que puedan atender su situación sin perder su empleo y sin que el patrono tome represalias contra estas víctimas. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:30 am
Alright, fine. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
ICO The ICO blog reports that the ICO has fined Vote Leave Limited £40,000 for sending out thousands of unsolicited text messages in the run up to the 2016 EU referendum. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 3:26 pm
AG Szpunar thinks not necessarily | The CNY 260 million fine on QVOD is final! [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:22 am
Alright, but a public Facebook profile isn't private so it's fine. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm
Last month, the SCOTUS ruled in Timbs v Indiana that a state's fine or forfeiture scheme may be excessive and thus unconstitutional under the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:47 pm
Indiana Case In Tyson Timbs v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
Fines can be substantial and the violator will need to return any improperly received payments – reimburse the federal health care program directly or through the Department of Justice. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 4:30 am
Para información adicional sobre este tema, también pueden comunicarse al Secretariado por vía telefónica al (787)723-6033; Ext. 2131, 2132. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 4:11 am
Narroschke was confidential.This submission was filed after the debate on the matter had been closed and a decision had been taken during the Oral Proceedings and has therefore not been taken into account.Relying on a number of portions of the Guidelines for Examination in the EPO (hereinafter: the "Guidelines"), Part C, Chapter V, the appellants refer to the fact that, further to the communication according to Rule 71(3) EPC, they had requested grant of a patent based on a higher… [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:05 am
In a subsequent case, (R (Goloshvili) v Secretary of State [2019]), a landlord was issued with a Notice of Letting to Disqualified Person and was warned that if they did not evict the tenant they could “face an unlimited fine or be sent to prison for up to five years. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 12:59 pm
And of course there are the costs and fines that accompany convictions; these costs can be quite high and can create their own set of problems for people of limited means. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
Lady Black’s judgment Lady Black extensively reviewed the authorities, beginning with the landmark judgments of the House of Lords in In re F (Mental Patient: Sterilisation) [1990] 2 AC and Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
Obduskey v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 11:02 pm
Koh's upcoming FTC v. [read post]
