Search for: "Law v. United States"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 62,869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2008, 10:29 pm
United States, 844 F.2d 1239, 1245 (6th Cir.1988). [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:14 pm
Each plaintiff had legally worked in the United States for six or more years. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:25 pm
New York’s Administrative Procedures Act does not require a State agency to issue a declaratory ruling when requestedMatter of Humane Society of United States, Inc. v Brennan, 63 AD3d 1419The genesis of this lawsuit was the New York State’s Department of Agriculture and Markets' declining to issue a declaration that foie gras* is an adulterated food product within the meaning of Agriculture and Markets Law §200. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 7:28 pm
Yudes’ June, 2013 blog post, he discussed the landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 7:24 am
Constitution and laws. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
In Crosspoint Church v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:33 pm
In the Hermès v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm
Baker and Mathew (Tribal Jurisdiction; Younger Abstention Doctrine) United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:01 am
” Although “manifest disregard of the law” is not stated as grounds to vacate an award in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Maryland Uniform Arbitration Act, the Court followed Sharp v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 2:33 am
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am
The State’s reduction of its employer contribution for health insurance premiums for judges was an unconstitutional diminution of judicial compensationBransten v State of New York, 2014 NY Slip Op 03214, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSitting and retired members of the New York State Judiciary challenged the State’s recent decrease in its employer contribution to the cost of the judges' health insurance premiums, contending that it… [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 12:00 pm
After considering the approach in the United States and Canada and the domestic case law on justification of interferences with constitutional rights she concluded that a rule which placed the burden of proving falsity on the plaintiff would put his constitutional rights to dignity at risk [52]. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:53 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:21 pm
Harrington (Prisoner Civil Rights)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlHwal'Bay Ba J Enterpises v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 6:29 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:55 am
In Washington State Grange v. [read post]
