Search for: "POST v. STATE" Results 4121 - 4140 of 99,779
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2011, 1:28 pm
On January 19, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Harrington v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:22 am by Kate Evans
Some state statutes sweep broadly, like the Georgia law at issue in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:28 pm by Lawrence Solum
Charles has posted The Second Amendment Standard of Review after McDonald: 'Historical Guideposts' and the Missing Arguments in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix
On 25 February 2015, the Supreme Court handed down its judgments in R (oao Rotherham Metropolitan BC and Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 6. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:04 am by CMS
In this post, Karishma Gadhia, an associate in the litigation and arbitration team at CMS and Tobias Seger, a trainee at CMS, comment on the decision handed down in early November 2020 by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Secretary of State for Health and others v Servier Laboratories Ltd and others [2020] UKSC 44. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 3:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Part V examines the current state of Gift Clause jurisprudence in Arizona. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 5:15 am by igorodetski
United States published in the Federalist Society's Practice Groups' Journal Engage, tracking the historical, legal, and judicial developments leading up to Skilling v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 1:24 am by Jamison Koehler
The post “Touching” versus “feeling” in Augustin v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:06 pm by JoAnn Hymel
  The post United States 5th Circuit Rejects Employee’s Request for Additional LHWCA Benefits appeared first on MBLB. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm by Sean Toomey
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]