Search for: "Peter v. Peter" Results 4121 - 4140 of 8,629
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2021, 5:34 am by Ben Millson (Bristows)
Turning to de minimis, Arnold LJ noted that it was common ground that his own statement of the law in Napp v Dr Reddy’s [2016] EWHC 1517 (Pat) was accurate, and analysed whether three “groups” of infringement were de minimis. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:20 am
GuestKat Peter Ling reports on this interesting decision.Richard Vary provides a guest contribution, in which he looks into the recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, which overturned a decision issued in December 2017 by Judge Selna in the Central District of California, instead going to a jury trial.Trade MarksGuestKat Léon Dijkman looks at the recent Opinion of Advocate General Bobek in Primart… [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 12:09 pm
: G 1/18, the decision | Coloplast v Salts: Should UK infringement proceedings be stayed if the patent has been opposed? [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
– Philip Steele Case Law: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Success for claimant in Twitter libel case – Nathan Capone Case Law: Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing, Subject access requests: Court of Appeal bolsters right to disclosure of data – Ashley Hurst and Peter Barratt [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 2:01 pm
Enligt vad man kan läsa pÃ¥ bloggarna blev Rost själv lite förvÃ¥nad först, men sen har han döpt om sin egen blogg till "Peter Rost for FDA commissioner".Det finns en önskan frÃ¥n flera hÃ¥ll att fÃ¥ en… [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 2:37 am
The ‘situation' was born from Peter Smith J's decision not to recuse himself from the case of Howell v Lees Millais (2007). [read post]
25 May 2022, 10:04 am by Jason Shinn
Here’s an excerpt from the complaint, Van Dyke Horn LLC v Peter Van Dyke: This case is about an equity member, officer and high-level executive of VDH, Peter Van Dyke, intentionally diverting and misappropriating trade secrets of VDH and converting assets of VDH, including clients, for his own benefit after failing to force his partner, Marilyn Horn, to sell her interest in VDH to him for pennies. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 11:55 am by Emily Hammond
ShareThe Supreme Court heard oral argument Tuesday in HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Neither, says the judge in patent and trade mark case Schutz (UK) Ltd v Werit UK; Schutz UK Ltd, Schutz GmbH & Co KgAA v Delta Containers Ltd (PatLit) EWHC: RIM v Visto: Mr Justice Arnold takes charge (PatLit) Banking brand values plummet (IAM)   United States   US General  Judd Gregg to be nominated as Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
The list of streams follows below.The Streams provide the Conference sub-themes, helping to put papers in conversation with each other while creating ongoing conversations across sessions.Corporate Imaginaries Convenors: Penny Crofts (University Technology Sydney), Timothy Peters (University of the Sunshine Coast)Contact: Penny Crofts (penny.crofts@uts.edu.au), Timothy Peters (tpeters@usc.edu.au)It has long been asserted that corporations are legal fictions. [read post]