Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 4121 - 4140 of 6,064
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2011, 8:26 am by WSLL
Appellee appealed the DOR’s determination to the State Board of Equalization (SBOE), asserting it did not retain that type of information and its refund should be estimated using a process employed in a prior audit to assess sales tax. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:24 am by sevach
La aparente desproporción entre sentencia y hechos invita a una reflexión. 1.En primer lugar, la lectura de la  sentencia revela que es un resultado laborioso y fundado y que no ha sido cómodo para el Tribunal juzgar a otro juez. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Scott Van Soye
Also fear is often present in: purchase and sale, eviction, foreclosure, short sale, construction defect, environmental pollution. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) General Court: Galileo trumps Galileo in battle of the Galileos over Community trade mark (IPKat) What’s the point of designs – point of sale or point of use? [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:02 am by Eric
§ 230(c)(2)(A).) eBay does not urge this ground in its respondent’s brief [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
Click here for the complete S&C publication - Conflicts of Interest in Securitizations. [1] Section 3(a)(77) of the Securities Exchange Act provides that the term “asset-backed security”: “(A) means a fixed-income or other security collateralized by any type of self-liquidating financial asset (including a loan, a lease, a mortgage, or a secured or unsecured receivable) that allows the holder of the security to receive payments that depend primarily on… [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:03 am by Marie Louise
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:52 am by Massimiliano Di Martino
In its Judgment in Case C-439/09 Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique SAS v Président de l’Autorité de la Concurrence and Others, the European Court of Justice recalls that in order to assess whether a contractual clause involves a restriction of competition “by object”, regard must be had to the content of the clause, the objectives it seeks to attain and the economic and legal context of which it forms a part. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. [read post]