Search for: "Shields v. State" Results 4121 - 4140 of 5,117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2023, 5:29 am by Abbe R. Gluck
Yet pressure exerted by mass torts, including the needs of victims, has led lawyers on both sides of the “v” to innovate in the name of resolution. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 6:31 am by Ron Miller
As these cases demonstrate, a spontaneous action by an employee may not be shielded by state law against an employer’s decision to take disciplinary action for weapons at work. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 3:20 am by Peter Mahler
The judge denied the motion by handwritten order (read here) stating simply that the petitioner failed to demonstrate grounds for reconsideration. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:10 am by Amy Howe
Helmerich & Payne points to the Supreme Court’s 1946 decision in Bell v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:00 am by Gabriel Chin
In addition to evoking memories of a time when congressional relief for unauthorized migrants was more possible, United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
United States), for federal agents, and to 1961 (Mapp v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm by Chip Merlin
   A statement or representation, or use of a logo or shield, that implies or could mistakenly be construed to imply that the solicitation was issued or distributed by a governmental agency or is sanctioned or endorsed by a governmental agency. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
The same Google that forfeited $500 million to the United States government after it got caught assisting foreign pharmacies in importing illegal drugs thinks it’s OK to assist foreign rogue sites in the commission of online piracy. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
This article is mostly about federal courts, because reviewing just what they do is daunting enough; but I occasionally cite relevant state cases, since many state courts seem to take an approach similar to that of the federal courts. [read post]