Search for: "State v. Price" Results 4121 - 4140 of 13,238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 2:27 am by Keith Mallinson
The new US Department of Justice antitrust leader says antitrust enforcers are too accommodating to IP implementers when in dispute with standard-essential patent owners. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 5:13 am by David Fraser
Indeed, the use of data for historical statistics of selling prices necessitates that the data will be kept. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 5:13 am by privacylawyer
Indeed, the use of data for historical statistics of selling prices necessitates that the data will be kept. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:00 pm by John Chierichella and Adam Bartolanzo
The statute expressly stated that submission of cost or pricing data shall not be required. [read post]
He states that a “very senior member of the Presidential Transition Team,” a “senior [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:39 pm by Amy Howe
The power district moved to dismiss the case, arguing that it cannot be sued under federal antitrust law because Arizona law gives it the authority to set prices – a doctrine known as “state-action immunity. [read post]
The plaintiff alleged that the defendant paid royalty fees at a price lower than the commercial price, and improperly deducted a state conservation fee that the defendant, not the royalty owners, was required to pay. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:55 am by Paul S.O. Barbeau
However, in Zhang v Amaral-Gurgel the Court took a firm stance on the use and abuse of such “lawyer approval” clauses. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:38 pm by John Chierichella and Adam Bartolanzo
The statute expressly stated that submission of cost or pricing data shall not be required. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 2:08 am
  Applying this to the case, the BGH expressly stated that sending emails containing price and product lists did not trigger the jurisdiction of the German courts. [read post]