Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Banks"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 4,975
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2010, 1:07 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil PracticeBank, Subsidiary's Interests 'Intertwined' for 'Younger' Abstention on Relief Barring City Code EnforcementHSBC Bank USA N.A. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 10:32 am
Source: People- Mother of Tennis Star Anna Kournikova Arrested [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:42 am
” Public Utilities Comm’n. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
It can remind us to be better people, to engage in public service and to help others who are not as fortunate. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:15 am
I was able to choose my next job based on whether or not it was a good fit v. a good pay check. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 2:32 pm
After all: receiving a giant bonus for standing by while your bank teeters on the verge of implosion may make some people feel better, but getting to know what's underneath the robe of your favorite Article III judge brightens everyone's day. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner… [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner… [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 2:32 am
White v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:58 am
Bank of America Corp. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 9:42 am
(Bank of the West v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 8:23 am
People v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:44 am
The starting-point for this little essay is a dictum of Lord Justice Jacob (noted by the IPKat here) in European Central Bank v DSS [2008] EWCA Civ 192 to this effect: "[This litigation] illustrates yet again the need for a one-stop patent shop (with a ground floor department for first instance and a first floor department for second instance) for those who have Europe-wide businesses. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 12:26 am
Deutsche Bank AGU.S. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 11:05 pm
In those days, all Banks are European Banks as those are run by Europeans and these people believe that Indians are incapable of managing things as Sorabji felt. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 11:51 am
Banks case is decided in favour of the banks. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 2:21 pm
In a decision reported in July 2009, Mr Justice Mann found against them (see here for links to my posts on the Foxtons v. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 5:15 am
The case Stewart v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 4:08 pm
Naifs wh are still trying to get their mind round the idea of bank as a place where people frantically buy and sell stuff might do well to see if they can scare up a copy of Ken Auletta's Greed and Glory on Wall Street: The Fall of the House of Lehman (1986) in which he chronicles the titanic face-off between Pete Peterson --the "banker"--and Lew Glucksman--the "trader". [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 11:25 am
Quinn v. [read post]
