Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS" Results 4121 - 4140 of 8,604
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:30 am by Nathan Koppel
Here are the cases that the pundits are talking about: U.S. v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:43 am by Amy Howe
” In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Edward Blum urges the Court to grant review in a“constitutional challenge to how Texas created its state Senate districts” that “could reestablish electoral fairness in dozens of voting districts — not just in Texas but throughout the country. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 9:14 am by CJLF Staff
In the ruling, the state Supreme Court upheld the death penalty for Abraham Sanchez Jr., who had challenged the timing and use of the jury in adjudicating his claim of death penalty ineligibility under Atkins v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 3:08 pm by Ilya Somin
The anti-commandeering doctrine originated in the 1842 Supreme Court case Prigg v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 10:30 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 56618, (ED TX, June 9, 2010), a Texas federal district court adopted the recommendations of a federal magistrate judge (2010 U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:25 am
Perry, upholding a 10 Commandments display on the Texas state capitol grounds, was influenced by the belief that the display in the U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 7:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
., (collectively, “New World”) appeal from a finaldecision by the United States District Court for theNorthern District of Texas dismissing New World’s declaratoryjudgment complaint for lack of personal jurisdictionover defendant-appellee Ford Global Technologies,LLC (“FGTL”). [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 1:58 am by Dennis Crouch
Guest post by Saurabh Vishnubhakat, Professor at the Texas A&M University School of Law and the Texas A&M College of Engineering. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:10 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]