Search for: "United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit" Results 4121 - 4140 of 7,493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2017, 1:28 pm
 Over at PATENTLYO, Dennis Crouch blogs about the non-precedential decision In re Chudik, issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which involved whether a functional limitation contained in a claim can be found in the prior art. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
The employer did not point to any express provision excluding the grievances from arbitration, observed the appeals court. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 5:57 pm
Below, Sally Laing previews the third case to be heard on Monday — No. 07-773, Vaden v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
On appeal Miller argues that the state appellate court unreasonably concluded that McShane's performance at sentencing was not deficient or prejudicial, and he further contends that United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am by Michael C. Dorf
The district court invalidated the settlement but the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reinstated it. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 9:58 am by Nora Ellingsen
The case is on to its second appeal before the Sixth Circuit, and arguments are scheduled for October 11. [read post]
11 May 2023, 10:00 am by Jo Dale Carothers
” The Federal Circuit disagreed, stating that it would not “invade the province of the district court. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
The Court affirmed the decision rendered by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (which the AmeriKat analysed in detail here), observing that, if purchasers were allowed to replicate the invention, there would be a 'mismatch between invention and reward' and the patent would afford little protection to the inventor. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 6:31 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Back n 2014, however, the United States Supreme Court rejected that test in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 6:40 pm
Defendant Davist appeals from his sentence for false claims against the United States, conspiracy to defraud the United States, and false statements. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which decided this case, held that he would not. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:59 pm by James Romoser
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit (in a decision that created a split with three other circuits) sided with Taylor. [read post]