Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 4121 - 4140 of 10,390
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2014, 11:19 am by Laura (Program Assistant)
Maciej Lipinski A recent ruling in the United States has repercussions for a woman seeking refugee status in Canada. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:13 am by Kiran Bhat
United States and reached different results in cases involving the revocation of a defendant’s supervised release. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 3:45 pm
In a 1986 decision, Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
” From the Introduction:  On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in one of the most closely-watched, and potentially consequential, antitrust decisions in recent years, Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Ron Coleman
On Valentine’s Day, appropriately enough perhaps, Tiffany (the jeweler, not the singer) filed a complaint against Costco in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, asserting a variety of trademark-related causes of action. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
    “Plaintiff seeks to recover damages she allegedly sustained from the sale of her residential condominium located at 200 East End Avenue, in the city, state, and county of New York, in December 2009, which was sold at a lesser price due to the defendant brokers’ erroneous measurement of the unit. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:24 am by Dan Bressler
In 2003, the United States Supreme Court established a six-factor test in Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2006, 8:17 pm
Additionally, by defining a famous mark as one that is "widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services," the TDRA essentially does away with the idea of "niche market" fame. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm by Jordan Brunner
DOJ has asked the 9th Circuit to hold its consideration of Washington v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
  A bunch of plaintiffs from the United Kingdom sought to sue in the United States, despite their drugs being subject to an entirely different regulatory framework. [read post]