Search for: "United States v. Robert" Results 4121 - 4140 of 9,865
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2012, 6:46 am by Conor McEvily
United States, in which the Court will consider whether federal immigration laws impliedly preempt Arizona’s controversial S.B. 1070. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am by Marissa Miller
The measure at issue is nearly identical to the ban in federal law struck down in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:52 am by Terry Hart
“Without this legislation, the existence of the broadcast news monitoring industry in the United States is and will remain in jeopardy. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am by Anna Christensen
President Obama’s criticism of the Supreme Court’s recent Citizens United decision in Wednesday’s State of the Union address dominated the headlines yesterday and today. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:04 pm
This is the version that will appear in the United States Reports, the official record of the Court’s opinions. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Additionally, Title V (§ 5105) would extend protection against national origin and citizenship status discrimination beyond the acts of hiring and discharge from employment to also include “verification of the individual’s eligibility to work in the United States” or “verification of employment authorization,” and would transfer enforcement jurisdiction over this form of national origin discrimination from the Equal Employment Opportunity… [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Additionally, Title V (§ 5105) would extend protection against national origin and citizenship status discrimination beyond the acts of hiring and discharge from employment to also include “verification of the individual’s eligibility to work in the United States” or “verification of employment authorization,” and would transfer enforcement jurisdiction over this form of national origin discrimination from the Equal Employment Opportunity… [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:05 am
Therefore, the relevant factors weigh in favor of transferring this case to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. [read post]