Search for: "University System v. State" Results 4121 - 4140 of 8,142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Monday’s Supreme Court ruling in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 6:39 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is probably why some municipalities require supermarkets to put price stickers on consumer goods.The case is Poughkeepsie Supermarkets v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:14 pm by Jason Rantanen
Samsung, stating: “We are bound by what the statute says, irrespective of policy arguments that may be against it”[xiii]. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:30 pm by Sara Bodnar
The 2009 Supreme Court decision, Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 6:23 am by Eugene Volokh
” The Policy “is paramount to other policies of the University that may conflict, except those grounded expressly in local, state, or national law. [read post]
8 May 2016, 6:24 pm by Dennis Crouch
Shubha Ghosh, Crandall Melvin Professor of Law and Director of the Technology Commercialization Law Program at Syracuse University College of Law In Stanford v Roche, 563 U.S. 776 (2011), the Supreme Court ruled that the Bayh-Dole Act did not create special rules of patent ownership for universities and other recipients of federal research funding. [read post]
8 May 2016, 7:01 am
Upholding the constitutional validity of the Act, and following State of A.P. v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:18 am by Robin Shea
The DOJ also sent letters yesterday to the University of North Carolina system and to the North Carolina Department of Public Safety, alleging that they are in violation of (as applicable) Title VII, Title IX, and the Violence Against Women Act. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:44 am by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
However, the insurers often seek to deny coverage for the losses, arguing that courts draw a distinction between losses where a thief hacks the insured’s computer systems and losses in which the insured voluntarily transfers funds. [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:44 am by Olivier Moréteau
Rosalie Jukier, , McGill University (Canada)·         Unity and Diversity in Legal History of the Commonwealth CaribbeanAsya Ostroukh, Cave Hill Campus of the University of the West Indies (Barbados)·         Rebuilding the Somali Legal System: Towards a New Mixed Jurisdictions? [read post]
2 May 2016, 7:49 am by Joy Waltemath
Denying Walmart’s motion to dismiss the gender discrimination claim of a former Dukes class member, a federal district court in Louisiana found she pleaded facts sufficient to inform the retail giant of the claims she intends to pursue; additional facts provided in her complaint directly related to her EEOC charge; her claim did not fall within the universe of claims the Dukes district court limited; and while her charge referred to “female employees who were similarly… [read post]