Search for: "DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT" Results 4141 - 4160 of 8,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2018, 1:36 pm by Marty Lederman
Daley, 209 F.3d 481, 485 (6th Cir. 2000), that potential exchange of ideas is not the basis for the government regulation here. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:32 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It lost a case involving a District of Columbia drug dealer in the D.C. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:04 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Government then charged him with treason against the United States for organizing and arming the 1864 military invasions of Maryland and the District of Columbia during the American Civil War (1861–1865). [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:03 am by Richard Renner
We might also remember that 600,000 U.S. citizens do not have the power to choose how they are governed because they happen to live in the District of Columbia. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:57 pm by Lawrence Solum
Among the spaces that the Article considers are "the Land" referenced in the Supremacy Clause, the "United States," "States," "Territory," "Property," the District of Columbia, federal enclaves, vicinage "districts," the "high Seas," "admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction," Indian lands, national airspace, and underground resource deposits. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:37 am
The stay was granted by US District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Emmet Sullivan, as was an extension, but now the stay expires on April 21, 2010, and a status report on how the negotiations are proceeding is due on April 15, 2010.Lead counsel for the plaintiffs, Joseph Sellers, of Washington's Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, believes the two parties are not close to reaching a settlement. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 5:38 pm by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which on June 2 issued a decision that left Friedrich’s stay in place. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 12:53 pm by Jon
Congress may make federal reserve notes legal tender on federal territory, like the District of Columbia or various military bases and port facilities, under Art. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
But the  proposition that they would cease buying charge-off bank debt altogether is not plausible, especially when the collection of charged-off consumer debt is their sole line of business and the very reason for their existence.MORE COMMENTARY OF THE DANGER-GLOOM-IF-NOT-DOOM GENRE INTEREST EXPORTATION AND PREEMPTION: "MADDEN'S" IMPACT ON NATIONAL BANKS, THE SECONDARY CREDIT MARKET, AND P2P LENDING Michael Marvin Columbia Law Review Vol. 116, No. 7 (NOVEMBER… [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
But the  proposition that they cease buying charge-off bank debt altogether is not plausible, especially when the collection of charged-off consumer debt is their sole line of business and the very reason for their existence.MORE COMMENTARY OF THE DANGER-GLOOM-IF-NOT-DOOM GENRE INTEREST EXPORTATION AND PREEMPTION: "MADDEN'S" IMPACT ON NATIONAL BANKS, THE SECONDARY CREDIT MARKET, AND P2P LENDING Michael Marvin Columbia Law Review Vol. 116, No. 7 (NOVEMBER 2016),… [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
But the new district attorney – Alvin Bragg – refused to go forward. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:55 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia.? [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
District Court for the District of Columbia changed that and ordered the EEOC to “take all steps necessary to complete the EEO-1 Component 2 data collections for calendar years 2017 and 2018 by September 30, 2019. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 11:20 am by Ryan McKeen
Attorney in the District of Columbia investigating the removal of U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 4:05 pm by Darrin Mish
” The DLC had its tax exempt status revoked from 1997 to 1999 but subsequently, the US District Court for the District of Columbia overruled the IRS and restored the status of the DLC. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 7:06 pm by FDABlog HPM
  According to the complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia this week by the Department of Justice, the government claims that since at least November 2009, Jason violated the FTC’s 1992 Order by making unsubstantiated weight loss claims, primarily through consumer endorsements. [read post]