Search for: "Legall v. State"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 88,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
” Pomeroy v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:07 am
The State Court of Appeals sustains some of these convictions, but it does something that courts have threatened to do for years: it strikes down the Aggravated Harassment law as unconstutitional.The case is People v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 4:27 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm
I would add another encomium: innovative legal problem solver. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 11:02 am
Anna Fitz-James v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:01 am
In Seaman v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:47 am
” Dye v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 10:19 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am
In brief, the case of R v Egan [1992] 4 All ER 470 had stated (without the court having heard full argument) that the previous case of R v Lloyd [1967] 1 QB 175 legitimised two approaches to defining ‘substantial’ in the context of diminished responsibility. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 3:35 pm
VP Racing Fuels, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
As stated in North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760 he ‘is not an insurer against all hazards’. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 6:09 am
EFF is part of the legal team representing the plaintiffs challenging SESTA/FOSTA under the First Amendment in Woodhull v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:55 pm
Supreme Court ruling from Michigan v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:49 pm
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the CFPB's funding mechanism in its 7-2 decision in CFPB v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:18 pm
United States, 522 U.S. 23, 29 (1997). [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 10:38 am
APPEAL/RESTITUTIONUnited States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 3:57 pm
Roarty v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 3:57 pm
Roarty v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:34 am
Plaintiff has pleaded that, but for defendants' malpractice in failing to advise her properly, she "would have avoided some actual ascertainable damage" (see IMO Indus. v Anderson Kill & Olick, 267 AD2d 10, 11 [1999]), [*2]including sufficient detail as to the "nature of" the underlying claim (see Reid v Druckman, 309 AD2d 669 [2003]). [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:34 am
Supreme Court (Garry, J.) granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
