Search for: "Light v. United States" Results 4141 - 4160 of 11,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
  The California Supreme Court doesn't feel that issue's sufficiently important to grant review.But the United States Supreme Court does. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am by Orin S. Kerr
United States holds that Miranda is a constitutional rule, not some sort of supervisory decision; and 42 U.S.C. 1983 provides that a person who "causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:04 am by Tarunabh Khaitan
Nevertheless, they contended that the obligation to establish an independent anti-corruption unit is implicit in the Constitution when viewed in the light of South Africa‘s international treaty obligations. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 6:58 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
OrbisDefendant ORBIS Corporation (“ORBIS”) appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the South- ern District of Ohio denying its motion for fees, costs, reasonable attorney fees, and expenses. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 4:49 am by SHG
At the WaPo Conspiracy, insomniac lawprof Orin Kerr posts about an important Second Circuit opinion: The Second Circuit has handed down a very important new Fourth Amendment case, United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the justices voted 7-2 to reaffirm the “separate sovereigns” exception to the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause, allowing federal and state governments to prosecute a defendant for the same conduct. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:11 am by Joshua Matz
In The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Julia Angwin and Jess Bravin report on arguments made by the government in a GPS tracking case in the Ninth Circuit in light of the Court’s decision earlier this year in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 5:49 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
As always, courts will assess a wide range of fact specific hardship questions as well. -- Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of PennsylvaniaOpinion Date: 5/31/11Cite: Colorcon, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” In addition, if more states enact fair access laws, financial institutions may be required to comply with an increasing number of fair access laws that may be inconsistent from state to state. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:13 pm by Victoria VanBuren
He suggested that I explore the topic of "manifest disregard" of the law in light of the United States Supreme Court decision Hall Street Associates, LLC v. [read post]