Search for: "S. W. v. State"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 14,901
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2018, 10:57 am
Cooperate or litigate This will add to the ongoing “cooperate v. litigate” debate in data protection and privacy matters. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 9:19 am
W. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 4:41 am
” At the Council of State Governments Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen looks at the recent cert grant PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
"Supreme Court denied Lisa Brown's petition seeking to annul and vacate New York Police Department's [NYPD] decision to refer her for a fitness-for-duty evaluation that ultimately resulted in Brown's suspension without pay for 58 days for "disobeying orders to sign Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [HIPAA] releases. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
"Supreme Court denied Lisa Brown's petition seeking to annul and vacate New York Police Department's [NYPD] decision to refer her for a fitness-for-duty evaluation that ultimately resulted in Brown's suspension without pay for 58 days for "disobeying orders to sign Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [HIPAA] releases. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 1:19 pm
See Hefley v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:32 am
Angelos' hearing, the court imposed sentence in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:32 am
Angelos' hearing, the court imposed sentence in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 3:46 am
Rosin v Schnitzler, 2018 NY Slip Op 32320(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Sept. 4, 2018]. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
State Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
State Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 8:51 am
Descamps v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
Robert W. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:17 pm
" The only fact necessary to justify such a variance is the sentencing court's disagreement with the guidelines – its policy view that the 100-to-1 ratio creates an unwarranted disparity.See Spears, __ S.Ct. at __, 2009 WL 129044 at *2 (quoting United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:17 pm
" The only fact necessary to justify such a variance is the sentencing court's disagreement with the guidelines – its policy view that the 100-to-1 ratio creates an unwarranted disparity.See Spears, __ S.Ct. at __, 2009 WL 129044 at *2 (quoting United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:34 am
United States, 202 F.3d 1360, 1363 (Fed. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
In 2005, George W. [read post]
