Search for: "State v. Branch"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 7,008
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2009, 3:03 am
Subsection (ii) - Executive Branch EmployeesSubsection (ii) refers to "a Presidential appointee or State employee to which section 302(a)(1) of the Government Employee Rights Act of 1991 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(a)(1)) applies. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:03 pm
Turner v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:06 pm
North Carolina State Health Plan for Teachers & State Employees v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 7:20 am
Roe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 2:08 pm
” By a vote of 6-3, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday in Pugin v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:41 pm
” Baldwin v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
The electors in each state shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the state legislatures. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:03 am
The time has come to end that search altogether, according to the appeal in the case of Rucho v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
Hall's holding on state sovereign immunity in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 5:55 am
We should not forget that the rule of law problem the United States faces is bigger than Trump. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 7:08 am
Although legislatures were the dominant branch of state governments during the revolutionary era, Morris envisioned three co-equal branches of the national government. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am
They insulated themselves from the normal checks and balances between the political branches and the judiciary. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:40 pm
Central Nat’l Branch of First Nat’l Bank of Lubbock, 876 S.W.2d 377, 380 (Tex. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 3:46 am
” Part V will respond to recent academic arguments suggesting that the President is an “officer of the United States” for purposes of Section 3. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:18 am
By their decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
24 May 2025, 3:49 am
In Michaelson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 11:01 am
But we live in an era in which Presidents and the executive branch turn increasingly to the administrative state to implement priorities that they cannot enact through Congress. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:33 pm
Ohio; Cox v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 7:10 am
Monday the Court called for the views of the Solicitor General in Carmichael v. [read post]
