Search for: "State v. C. S." Results 4141 - 4160 of 37,714
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2022, 9:44 am
Companies that provide or facilitate the trade in wheat from let's say Russia to the People's Republic of China and thereby provide Russia with the financial capability for ongoing adverse human rights violence may also face significant exposure for complicity. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 9:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Such an application would breach the provision’s textual limits and would be contrary to the just-discussed decisions addressing § 303(c). [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 1:30 am by Paul Cartwright
In dealing with the necessary evidence to discharge the onus, the court quoted the matter of National Employer’s General Insurance v Jagers [1984 (4) SA 437 € at 440 D-G], which stated: “In deciding whether the evidence is true or not the court will weigh up and test the plaintiff’s allegations against the general probabilities. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:18 pm by Larry
The context for this dispute flows out of the earlier (and un-appealed) CIT decision in Energizer v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:04 am by Matthias Weller
      It is not possible, for the purposes of determining the children’s place of habitual residence, within the meaning of Article 8 of Regulation No 2201/2003, only to take into consideration criteria such as the mother’s nationality, the fact that she resided in a Member State before her marriage, the nationality of the minor children and their birth in that Member State. 3. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 7:49 am by Alexander J. Davie
The audit would need to: (1) be performed by an independent public accountant that meets the standards of independence in rule 2-01(b) and (c) of Regulation S-X that is registered with and subject to regular inspection of the PCAOB; (2) meet the definition of audit in rule 1-02(d) of Regulation S-X, the professional engagement period of which shall begin and end as indicated in Regulation S-X rule 2-01(f)(5); and (3) be prepared in accordance with GAAP, or in the… [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:01 am by David A. Martin
The central part of the 117-page opinion,  captioned Texas v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 2:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
" A prior panel precedent is "undermined," we explained in United States v. [read post]