Search for: "State v. Mar" Results 4141 - 4160 of 4,938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2015, 11:32 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Drivers for Uber and Lyft claimed they are employees, not independent contractors. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 7:40 am by Christopher Tyner
  Requiring a person to serve an otherwise lawfully imposed sentence during a pandemic does not give rise to a claim of cruel and unusual punishment that can be successfully asserted in a MAR State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
Even in these cases, however, there is a potential trap for the unwary plaintiff if the subject business entity is a limited liability company, as nicely illustrated by a Manhattan federal judge’s decision last month in Sullivan v Ruvoldt, Opinion and Order, 16 Civ. 583 [SDNY Mar. 24, 2017]. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 4:37 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In a quintet of decisions over the past 25 years, the Appellate Division – First Department held that it will give lower courts the benefit of “significant leeway” in approximating damages for fiduciary breach: Keizman v Hershko, 52 AD3d 204 [1st Dept 2008] [“a trial court may be accorded significant leeway in ascertaining a fair approximation of the loss where, as here, a breach of fiduciary duty has been proved”]; Herman v Feinsmith, 39 AD3d 327… [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 8:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Paragraph (c) specifically references the ongoing investigation concerning Mar-A-Lago: (c) The Special Counsel is further authorized to conduct the ongoing investigation referenced and described in the United States' Response to Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief, DonaldJ Trump v. [read post]