Search for: "US Inventor"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 7,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2022, 11:25 am
The United States Constitution, by contrast, declares that the purpose of giving authors and inventors exclusive rights is simply “[t]o promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts,” (U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 10:20 am
However, the much more complex challenge (both for an inventor and a patent practitioner) is creating and claiming an invention that is non-obvious. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
Do not blame K2's inventor for sales and use of Spice. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 11:25 am
The United States Constitution, by contrast, declares that the purpose of giving authors and inventors exclusive rights is simply “[t]o promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts,” (U.S. [read post]
9 May 2010, 5:48 am
IPBiz notes that such a suggestion would put most universities and most small inventors out of the patent business. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 10:31 am
One group kept confusing us, though: universities. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:26 am
The jurisprudence for such international licensing disputes is broken and parties need to use arbitration. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 10:50 am
A 54-year-old inventor [Merpel's not sure what the relevance of the age is. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:17 am
[I]t’s an ethical thing for us…. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:52 am
Transferring rights to sell, but not use, more likely results in a license.[20] Dividing the right to manufacture from the right to use patents can result in a license.[21] Field of Use and Geographic Restrictions. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
Mike Masnick (credit: Eric Goldman) Even so, the ruling, which followed two-plus decades of legal precedent, brings to mind how lawsuits like this can be used as a weapon to stifle the First Amendment and extract huge settlements to make the issue disappear. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:15 am
That approach makes logical sense because it truly limits the claim to the subject matter that the inventor believed she had invented. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 1:54 pm
Arguably, US Patent No. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 5:28 am
According to the USPTO website, a patent is a property right granted by the Government of the United States of America to an inventor “to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling the invention throughout the United States or importing the invention into the United States” for a limited time in exchange for public disclosure of the invention when the patent is granted. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 3:12 am
It is purely a patent holding company consisting of two individuals: Raymond Ratcliff (inventor) and Frank Benevento (investor and decision maker for Exponential). [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 3:12 am
It is purely a patent holding company consisting of two individuals: Raymond Ratcliff (inventor) and Frank Benevento (investor and decision maker for Exponential). [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
What’s more, this control flows with the patents, so if we sold them to others, they could only use them as the inventor intended. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
What’s more, this control flows with the patents, so if we sold them to others, they could only use them as the inventor intended. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 12:07 pm
An inventor can bar a subsequent inventor from practicing an invention, even if the second inventor had no knowledge of the first and independently created the same invention, and there is no 'fair use' defense to patent infringement. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am
This takes us back to the question of a technical contribution, as Apple's patent attorney in this litigation, Dr. [read post]
