Search for: "Does, 1-20" Results 4161 - 4180 of 27,647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2020, 11:40 pm
"  Maui argued that the CWA permit requirement does not apply, because "at least one nonpoint source (e.g., unconfined rainwater runoff or groundwater) lies between the point source and the navigable water. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:28 am by Jessica Kroeze
In its reply dated 21 December 2018, the respondent corroborated its argumentation supporting priority entitlement by relying on the following new items of evidence:D31: Legal opinion of Mr G Kuipers of law firm De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek of Amsterdam, the Netherlands, dated 20 December 2018.D32: Legal opinion of Prof. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 9:35 am by Alysha Stein-Manes
The OCR investigations mentioned above were initiated pursuant to the DOE’s jurisdiction under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (“Title IX”) (20 U.S.C. section 1681 et seq.; 34 CFR Part 106). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am by Carolina Attorneys
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Jean O'Grady
Compose does not promise to replace lawyers – it offers to make lawyers more efficient by automating the first draft of a motion or brief. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:32 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Moreover, the amount paid to Pandit comes after he received only $1 in the prior year. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A polyurethane latex composition, said composition comprising a polyurethane aqueous dispersion that has less than 20 percent pendant chains by weight based on total weight of solids, said polyurethane aqueous dispersion being free of volatile solvent and being suitable for being dried to form a pressure-sensitive-adhesive composition.Claim 1 as maintained read:1. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
No turn around for the fortunes of Chanel’s double-CChanel v EUIPO Case T-44/20 EU General Court (April 2021) Does Chanel’s famous double-C logo conflict with this one filed by Chinese smartphone manufacturer Huawei? [read post]