Search for: "Does, 1-25"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 18,547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
Does it really need fixing? [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 6:31 am
Sotomayor does refer us to the District Court opinion, which she calls "thorough and well-reasoned opinion": 2021 WL 3821062, *8–*26 (WD Tex., Aug. 25, 2021). [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 12:04 pm
USNWR does not disclose them. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 1 regulates solid and hazardous waste and underground storage tanks. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:48 am
Using the mark in a form differing from the registered sign is sufficient under EU law if such use does not alter the distinctive character of the registered sign (Art. 18(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001). [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 12:04 pm
USNWR does not disclose them. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:00 am
” It reasoned that “[k]nowing that industry safety standards in general are important to consumers’ purchasing decisions does nothing to predict whether consumers might be dissuaded from buying a ladder that does not meet current ANSI standards” because Mr. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 7:04 am
Taking into consideration that the IPI is independent of the federal budget (Art. 1 of the Federal Law on the Statute and Responsibilities of the Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property) and is mainly financed by fees, such costs will have no direct impact on the Swiss budget (Botschaft, 72). [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:11 pm
On August 25, 2014, Judge Thomas P. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:14 am
What would have been achievable if those advocating weaker patent enforcement rules had done a better job would have been for the court to acknowledge that high invalidation rates--even though the law isn't a matter of statistics--may go into the proportionality analysis.The abject failure of efforts to reform German patent remedies law is demonstrated by today's decision, which cites § 139(1) of the German Patent Act (PatG), but does not even go on to quote or… [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:50 pm
The PTO does not dispute that this finding was erroneous. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 6:27 am
Here are his main points:1. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 10:36 am
Does the former cover the latter? [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 2:01 pm
Does 1-7494 F. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:48 am
The court filing itself says this:"The Settlement requires that Google maintain this program for U.S. developers through at least May 25, 2025. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
In relation to 'Strip That Down'; there was a clearance for 25 percent of the total, or 50 percent of the music, making it more probable that the claimants could see a risk copying being established. [read post]
19 May 2015, 2:57 pm
Id. at *25. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 7:39 pm
Presently, the "unlawfully interferes" standard applies to both the first and third scenario and the code does not address the second scenario. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am
Affinity Labsof Tex., LLC, No. 2015-006122, Reexamination No.95/001,223, 2015 WL 5092841, at *1 (P.T.A.B. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
" —Richard Feynman[1] Earlier I wrote about certain paradoxes in data privacy that have features in common with quantum physics. [read post]
