Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 9,557
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2016, 1:17 pm
This leads to the conclusion that, at least for coined-terms, the whole game is won or lost at step 1 from above. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 12:16 pm
Goldberg’stestimony that the terms “symbol” and “generator” areknown within the field of computer science is not dispositiveand does not require us to find that 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:49 am
“The district court’s analysis in this case, however, looks similar to an obviousness analysis under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:06 am
” Table 1 summarizes cheeses and cheese types subject to the 60-da [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:56 am
(see Matter of Neenan, 35 AD3d 475, 476 [2d Dept 2006]; Matter of Bartel, 214 AD2d 476 [1st Dept 1995]). [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:56 am
(see Matter of Neenan, 35 AD3d 475, 476 [2d Dept 2006]; Matter of Bartel, 214 AD2d 476 [1st Dept 1995]). [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:17 am
How does an NIT work? [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 12:34 am
The report does not say whether the 14% deserved to lose all their deposit. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
G.S. 20-35. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
G.S. 20-35. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 10:52 am
., Div. 1, 2016) ____ Cal.App.4th ________, 2016 WL_____________, Case No. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 6:50 am
The court denied plaintiff's motion for enhanced damages under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 1:30 am
The United States, however, has enacted a provision that deals with inventions in space, specifically 35 USC 105. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:54 pm
RubinHoldings: (1) Sole managing member of a special purpose entity can establish privity through control of litigation sufficient to prevent escape from application of doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel to his person relative to the special purpose entity; (2) Guarantor of a satisfied loan remains personally liable for attorneys’ fees under a fee-shifting provision where Borrowers became purposefully insolvent; (3) Merger Doctrine does not bar Plaintiff… [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Truly Nolen of Am., Inc., 164 So. 3d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). $135.02 formula fee for 35 hours of legal work = $3.86 an hour. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Truly Nolen of Am., Inc., 164 So. 3d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). $135.02 formula fee for 35 hours of legal work = $3.86 an hour. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 10:14 am
The patent’s first claim reads: 1. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 6:26 am
” The court reasoned (1) that the phrase “use of physical force” in 18 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 6:26 am
” The court reasoned (1) that the phrase “use of physical force” in 18 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 6:02 am
As many as 53 sickens, 13 hospitalized with 1 likely liver transplant. [read post]
