Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 7,889
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2014, 11:54 am
” Id. at *3. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:30 pm
Jan. 27, 2011).Issues[1] [Does] federal patent law waive tribal sovereign immunity because [35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:00 am
There may be some fluctuation in the amount of mandatory spending each year dependant on the number of people eligible for these programs, but in general mandatory spending is about 2/3 of the budget, discretionary spending is about 1/3 of the budget, the majority of which is military spending. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 4:15 am
John Doe. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 4:38 pm
” And judging by John Judis’s new book, not even TNR. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 10:36 am
700x in the last 3 years; others 50x in total. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:14 pm
Bender and John S. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 4:19 am
(Remember that the unemployment rate does not actually reflect people that are out of work. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
John W. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:22 am
The class must have questions of law or fact in common; 3. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:35 am
For Section 503 compliance, contractors will need the following three files/access systems: (1) personnel file; (2) ADA/Section 503 medical file; and (3) data analysis file. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
The plaintiff planned to have this turncoat expert witness offer opinions that (1) phlebotomy and venipuncture should be classified as inherently dangerous activities; (2) the Red Cross’s failure to maintain a log of needlestick injuries and to document the plaintiff’s injury violated the Needlestick Safety and Prevent Act of 2001 and constituted negligence per se; and (3) the failure to draw the plaintiff's blood properly and to provide appropriate… [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 2:50 pm
The prosecution’s theory of the case was that: 1) on the morning of December 3, 1997, Mr. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 8:54 am
”3 (Note here the reference to consent.) [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 6:34 pm
Id. at *2. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 3:50 am
Ok, here’s why it is weak : 1 unidentified sources. 2 unidentified sources may be crackers, well meaning but misinformed, or have an agenda. 3 Adoption targets are an urban myth. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:18 am
A patent holder could be: (1) a University; (2) an Individual Inventor/Family Trust (e.g, GeoTag); (3) a large Patent Aggregator (e.g., Acacia); (4) a Failed Operating Company or Failed Start-up; (5) a Patent Holding Company that appears unaffiliated with the original inventor or owner; (6) an Operating Company; (7) an IP Holding Company affiliated with an operating company; or (8) a Technology Development Company (e.g., Walker Digital). [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
John Doe) the Plaintiff was involved in a rear end collision in 2006. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
John W. [read post]
