Search for: "Mark May"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 64,950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2015, 9:06 pm
Mark J. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:28 pm
Under Nebraska law, candidates for certain public offices may voluntarily accept additional oversight in exchange for public financing [Neb Rev Stat § 1604], the levels of which may vary depending on the expenditures of privately-financed opponents.... [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:06 pm
Photographs from the scene show skid marks leading up to a jackknifed tractor-trailer. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 6:00 am
A business may be afforded a certain level of trademark protection in its geographic area simply by being the first to use a mark in commerce in connection with its goods or services. [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 7:37 am
Michael Kitces and client communication expert Carl Richards discuss the reasons advisors are so often skeptical of new investment opportunities, how they can communicate with clients as their views evolve, and how advisors who may have previously been too dismissive of a client’s interest in a new investment can rebuild any trust that may have been lost.https://www.advisorhub.com/resources/kitces-and-carl-handling-clients-who-bring-their-own-hot-investment-ideas/The… [read post]
27 May 2016, 7:44 pm
Simona Grossi (Loyola-LA) argues there is nothing inherently wrong with Thiel financing someone else's litigation, which represents a different type of third-party litigation financing, although she suggests that due process may require transparency in such funding arrangements.* Slate's Mark Joseph Stern argues that the problem is not Thiels funding the litigation, but that the litigation is possible because of elected state judges and state privacy torts that… [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 8:57 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois; • "Unfair" patent marking: The law may be changing, but has management learned its valuable lesson? [read post]
30 May 2024, 6:41 am
Marks of the U.S. [read post]
20 May 2008, 9:20 am
Since my last post I have finished writing my dissertation (which terrifyingly may even be marked by now) and started the process of 'revision', which - at this present stage - might more aptly be described as 'frantic learning'. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:53 am
., A-1769-08T1, May 14, 2010: Rule 1:2-2 requires all proceedings in court to be recorded verbatim, including “the content of an audio or video tape played during the proceedings” unless a transcript of the audio or video tape is marked into evidence. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 3:44 am
In May 2015, applicant was removed from the SDNT list. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:45 am
The IPKat does some fieldresearch into flowers ...Connoisseurs of long judgments will know that Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer Plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited [2013] EWHC 1291 (Ch) was decided last Monday, 21 May 2013, in the Chancery Division, High Court of Justice, England and Wales, by (who else?) [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
It was stated that the mark is a two-dimensional figurative mark that consists of a red coloured surface. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:30 am
" The word "tattoo" may also mean "a rapid rhythmic rapping" and "a call sounded shortly before taps. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:47 am
The other is that a trademark licensee may retain the right to use a mark after a licensing agreement is rejected. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:54 am
The doctrine may apply when assessing a mark’s “appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
If a registrant aggressively invests in its mark, it may be protected from cancellation as early as three years from registration (Ava Ruha). [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:57 am
" Moreover, the Board may consider the results of a properly conducted survey as "evidence akin to actual confusion. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:15 am
The false marking statute was a qui tam statute that provided a bounty for persons who spotted products marked with expired patents; it was amended to remedy litigation abuse. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 3:17 am
§ 1052(f), provides that “proof of substantially exclusive and continuous use” of a designation “as a mark by the applicant in commerce for the five years before the date on which the claim of distinctiveness is made” may be accepted as prima facie evidence that the mark has acquired distinctiveness as used in commerce with the applicant’s goods or services. [read post]
