Search for: "Samples v. Samples"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 5,710
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
This suggestion appears to confuse the frequentist enterprise for evaluating evidence on the basis of statistical measures of the probability of observing at least as great a departure from expected in a sample rather than attempting to affixing a probability to the population parameter. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 10:30 am
Or.); U.S. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:22 pm
Sample contracts would also be great. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 10:30 am
Or.); U.S. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 7:09 am
Hypothesis generating—anti-copying/copying practices, etc.Buccafusco: consider who’s in the sample—don’t limit to self-identified designers. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 2:36 pm
Better than on the field of battle, I'd think.Trilink Saw Chain, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm
The phosphodiesterases 5 inhibitor medications (PDE5i) seem to arouse the litigation propensities of the lawsuit industry. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 8:23 am
A very interesting decision today from the Iowa Supreme Court, in Bandstra v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
Between sample packs, letters, and visits (details mostly irrelevant), the various penalties were multiplied to reach nine figures. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 1:17 pm
In Robinson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:57 am
HMRC sent Nokia samples of those goods. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 9:05 pm
Texas Food Industry Ass’n v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 6:44 am
Sample Cosby Lawsuit IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND Jane Doe v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:39 pm
Along similar lines, the draft regulation also includes a system of sampling to determine whether patents are truly essential to the underlying standard. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:09 am
Ostrer, used to send patient samples to a rival clinical BRCA testing service provider but stopped following vigorous enforcement by Myriad of its intellectual property rights. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 9:44 am
State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: European Court of Justice raises bar for famous brand owners wishing to prove dilution: Intel Corporation v CPM United Kingdom (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (IPKat) (Class 46) RPX Corporation – Defensive patent aggregation club (Securing Innovation) (Patent Fools) (Patent Prospector) (Techdirt) (IAM)… [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 12:52 pm
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 9:12 am
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:10 am
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
