Search for: "State v. Agent"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 11,876
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2017, 10:35 am
The case is Mesa v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:27 pm
Wallace v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:20 am
See Jewelers Vigilance Comm., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
"As to Thompson's claims with respect to §75, in Antinore v Stat, 40 NY2d 6, the Court of Appeals ruled that a public employee's collective bargaining agent could bargain away the employee’s statutory disciplinary rights in favor of an alternative disciplinary procedure so long as the alternate procedure provided constitutional due process protections equivalent to those available under the statutory procedure that it replaced.. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 4:13 pm
This paper begins by arguing that Nautilus v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 10:29 am
S. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:42 am
The rare en banc vote was 7-5.The case is Francis v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 3:49 pm
They are also expanding both qualified immunity, which often protects both state and federal officials from paying damages, as well as flawed doctrine from Monell v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 3:19 pm
” Interconnect Planning Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 12:39 pm
Citizen Action v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am
Again, the context, of course, is the detention by the State of children and young persons. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Sica, Special Agent in Charge, United States Secret Service, New York Field Office. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 5:19 am
U.S. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
It is styled, Mayes v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:17 pm
Supreme court to mete out whether GPS surveillance should require a warrant (U.S. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:17 am
MishkinThirteen amicus briefs have been filed in Township of Mount Holly v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:55 am
N.A. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:32 am
The second memo, dated July 2012, is titled “Guidance Regarding the Application of United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 3:09 pm
In Gold v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:06 am
’United States v. [read post]
