Search for: "State v. E. F." Results 4161 - 4180 of 8,845
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court, however, cited the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decision in Barcelona.com, Inc v Excelentisimo Ayuntamiento de Barcelona, 330 F.3d 616 (4th Cir,. 2003, here) and the Second Circuit ruling in ITC Ltd v Punchgini, 482 F.3d 135 (2d Cir. 2007) (the Bukhara case, here) to the effect that those provisions give non-US parties rights that are coextensive with, not greater than, those otherwise provided under the Lanham Act. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 10:01 pm by Cookson Beecher
If the state can monitor and shut down shellfish beds that test positive for pathogens such as E. coli and norovirus, why can’t it do the same for V. parahaemolyticus? [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:44 am
Anybody who wants to rebroadcast a Fútbol para todos game has to include the propaganda. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
It provides that each state party will “respect and ensure” ICCPR rights to individuals within its territory and jurisdiction, without distinction. [read post]