Search for: "State v. Frame"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 6,713
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2013, 8:28 am
An amendment should specifically overturn Kohl v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 6:18 am
Seltzer v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:56 am
The Supreme Court would adopt Leval’s transformative framing in Campbell v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 4:09 am
At the hearing the other day, our reporters mentioned that the judge had asked for cases to support Motorola's position that the time frame to consider Motorola's good faith in making its initial offer was back when it happened: Judge asks when duty of good faith bargaining begins and ends. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:41 pm
Consider this photo of a mosaic: (sculpture by Jack Mackie, photo by Mike Hipple) Why doesn’t that change the meaning of the mosaic through the addition of the human following the steps and the framing choices that create a particular experience of the mosaic? [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:28 am
Tavera's motion for a new trial based on the Brady failure was still pending when the Sixth Circuit decided, in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 12:54 pm
In Boaz v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
”6 In support, he cites Eldred v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
This is the first in a multi-part series exploring the legal significance of violent online rhetoric by individuals including the vile Bill Schmalfeldt. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:37 am
Louis Art Museum (SLAM) this week answered the government's appellate brief in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 9:42 am
After the Supreme Court’s recent decision to incorporate the Second Amendment into the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
(Masonite Corporation Dist. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 1:42 pm
In Rose v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 12:12 pm
The first part is from an oft-repeated Supreme Court standard for the methodology of how to evaluate probable cause first announced in Brinegar v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Although it was the product of a 2-1 split decision, the ruling in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 6:03 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 6:53 am
” Secunda framed the central question this way: “Whether the bankruptcy court, as a result of the federal constitution’s Supremacy Clause, has the authority to ignore these provisions under state constitutional law, or whether the Tenth Amendment of the federal constitution (reserving certain traditional powers to the states) requires the bankruptcy court to abstain from acting until the Michigan state courts figure out whether the state… [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 12:40 pm
The state Supreme Court, ruling the recent case of Florida v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 11:20 am
Last week, the New Jersey Supreme Court held in State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The proponents’ best argument (although they don’t quite frame it this way), is that because it would be likely unlawful under federal law for Judge Walker to have granted relief to persons who weren’t plaintiffs, we should in effect add the words “as to the named plaintiffs” to his directive to the LA and Alameda Clerks. [read post]
