Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 4161 - 4180 of 16,267
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2018, 4:32 am by Jo Dale Carothers
  In fact, the government specifically names both entities in the petition, captioning it The United States Postal Service (USPS) and The United States of America v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 7:12 am by Paula Lombardi
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals twice ruled that the case should proceed to a trial on its merits. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:33 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
” Last month the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision of a California District Court Judge’s in the case John Doe I, et. al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm by Chris Attig
Second, we’ll discuss the Federal Circuit’s 2008 decision in Haas v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
Circuit (Judges Henderson, Rogers and Srinivasan) will hear argument in Miller v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:15 am by Leandra Lederman
A more recent example of a Tax Court violation of judicial norms was revealed by Ballard v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the FCC’s rules, and then denied rehearing en banc over the dissents of Judge Janice Rodgers Brown and then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
”2 I am not sure that the problems are dependent in the fashion suggested by the authors, but their assessment that judges may be reluctant to break the seal on the black box of epidemiology, and that judges frequently lack the ability to make nuanced evaluations of the studies on which expert witnesses rely seems fair enough. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 7:02 am by Daniel Hemel
United States — imposes taxes on “compensation” paid by railroads to their workers. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 10:07 am by Kent Scheidegger
On Friday, the Supreme Court took the case up: United States v. [read post]