Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 6,763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2013, 9:31 pm
While we’re on the subject of alcohol and rational deliberation (presuming at least a process of ‘democratic deliberation within’ before casting one’s vote), Elster also notes that in Tanner v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:23 am
She cited Crawford v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Perry and United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 12:21 pm
After Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
Did Romer effectively adjudge the voters of the state of Coloradoas bigoted? [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:54 am
In his Tennessee v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:00 pm
Cox v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 4:02 am
That article was a response to the Arizona v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 11:55 am
Shelby County v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court that the proponents of California’s voter-enacted ban on same-sex marriage, Proposition 8, lacked standing to represent the voters of the State even when the Attorney General and Governor declined to defend, combined with the decision by the U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
Board of Trustees and City of Hayward v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 11:45 am
Add to this the other election law case this Term -- Arizona v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 7:55 am
The Ninth Circuit ruled this week in Townley v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 10:30 am
The Florida House of Representatives, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:31 pm
(My curt analysis of U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:42 am
To this end, she relied primarily on an Ohio statute barring employers and their “officer[s] or agent[s]” from discharging a voter for taking time to vote, or intimidating a voter in order to induce him or her to vote (or refrain from voting) for or against any candidate. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 4:05 am
" ** See also Alexis v City of Niagara Falls posted on the Internet at: http://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/2013/05/an-employees-satisfying-employers.html The decision in this action is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2013/2013_04148.htm [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:47 pm
In Arizona v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 2:31 am
The Katpoll on Case C-128/11 UsedSoft v Oracle is now closed (background here). [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
Daniels argues that Congress should require “Voter Impact Statements” to be submitted to the Department of Justice whenever voting changes are proposed. [read post]
