Search for: "ABS-1 LLC" Results 401 - 420 of 455
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2010, 7:22 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Specifically, ALJ Bullock found that (1) Respondents’ accused products did not infringe claims 1-8 of U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:29 pm by Stefanie Levine
Also of interest is a request (Inter partes No. 1) filed by CEJN AB against Westendorf Mfg. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
KG v OHIM (IPKat) AG supports AB InBev’s case in BUD appeal: Anheuser-Busch v Bud? [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 5:53 am by Ray Mullman
The lawsuit was filed by Allen Bodner and DMV Funding LLC and is seeking no less than $150 million in damages and no less than $300 million in punitive damages. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am by Kelly
(Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Lanham Act claim based on bid to sell prison toothbrushes: Loops, LLC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 11:50 am
  Prior to the enactment of Dodd-Frank on July 21, 2010, Rule 436(g) provided that the credit rating assigned to debt securities, convertible debt securities, or preferred stock by a nationally registered statistical rating organization (NRSRO[1]) would not be considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by an expert within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Securities Act. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:10 am by John L. Welch
The drawing page was then amended from the mark shown above top to the mark shown above bottom, and the verification was subsequently filed.Applicant contended that (1) the underlying application was incomplete and thus void ab initio, and(2) Opposer did not have a bona fide intent to use the original mark, or the mark as amended.As to (1), the Board pointed out that even an unsigned application is given a filing date. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
General Foam Plastics Corp (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court Kansas: Third Party infringers have no standing to challenge assignment: KMMentor, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
The complaint alleged six additional breaches of the lease: (1) placement of large signs on the property in violation of a covenant not to alter, add to, or improve the property without consent; (2) painting of the building in violation of the same covenant; (3) operation of an unlicensed business in violation of a provision prohibiting illegal activities; (4) failure to maintain insurance in violation of a covenant requiring the tenants to maintain insurance; (5) failure to maintain the… [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:00 am by John L. Welch
He or she was authorized to act for Respondent, and Respondent should be responsible for the statements made.I think the Board should not only find fraud on those facts, but as an alternative ruling, find the Registrations void ab initio on the ground of filing of a false oath. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
Fred's Capital Management Company (TTABlog) TTAB reverses 2(d) refusal, finds AQ and PARADISE MAKEUP AQ not confusingly similar for cosmetics (TTABlog) TTAB cancels CITYSTAY HOTELS registration as void ab initio: Hotel lodging services not rendered as of filing date (TTABlog) 11th Circuit: District Court erred in not considering incontestable status of SLASH IT! [read post]