Search for: "ACTAVIS" Results 401 - 420 of 1,006
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
Although manufacturers are still fragmented, consolidations continue based on “better rationales” (given the standard merger rewards may not necessarily exist): including Pfizer/Hospira, Teva/Actavis and focused start-ups. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 14 February] – Indigenous IP | Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic London black cab | Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a map | A comprehensive explanation of trademarks | Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 7:00 am by Steve Brachmann
Actavis has given the FTC a greater capacity to challenge pay for delay schemes in court. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 14 February] – Indigenous IP | Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic London black cab | Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a map | A comprehensive explanation of trademarks | Actavis v Lilly.Never too late… [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:27 pm
. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 14 February] – Indigenous IP | Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic London black cab | Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a map | A comprehensive explanation of trademarks | Actavis v Lilly.Never too late… [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:51 pm by Patent Docs
Actavis, which held that under some circumstances such settlement agreements containing so-called "reverse payments" could violate... [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:53 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 14 February] – Indigenous IP | Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic London black cab | Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a map | A comprehensive explanation of trademarks | Actavis v Lilly.Never too late 82 [week ending on Sunday 7 February] – PhD Student Seminar at CIPA | IP meets Antimonopoly law in Japan | German Federal… [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 8:07 pm by Patent Docs
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 1:44 am
 Importantly, in contrast with the position in Actavis, Janssen had yet to decide the royalty rate. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:19 am
 As the AmeriKat was busy getting to grips with Mr Justice Arnold's decision in the latest Lilly v Actavis case (see here), she relied on the talented (and ever succinct)  Eibhlin Vardy (A&O), to analyze the decision. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:43 am
* Mr Justice Arnold foresees no infringing saline use in Actavis' pemetrexed futureIf you were at a loss as to what to get that special patent litigator in your life this Valentine's Day, look no further. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:25 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
He joined Chief Justice Robert's eBay concurrence emphasizing the long tradition of injunctive relief in patent cases, and he joined the Chief's Actavis dissent, which would have given pharmaceutical patentees broad immunity from antitrust law for "reverse payment" settlements. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:59 pm
The questionDo Actavis know, or it would be obvious to a reasonable person in the circumstances, that the Actavis product is likely to be diluted at least in some cases by some of Actavis' customers? [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 1:45 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The beginning of the en banc opinion reads:Congress has declared: “Except as otherwise providedin [the Patent Act], whoever without authority makes,uses, offers to sell, or sells any patented invention, withinthe United States or imports into the United States anypatented invention during the term of the patent therefor,infringes the patent. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
Never too late 78  [week ending on Sunday 27 December] – Zer-sum claim and lookalike products | 2015 Copyright Awards | Santa Claus and Section 52 | Jani writes on Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited | IP Hairballs |  Actavis v Eli Lilly | Power outage at USPTO | Santa's GC resigns | Pet rock and IP. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:50 am by Gregory B. Williams
  In reaching its claim construction, the Court rejected the proposed construction submitted by defendant Actavis and partially rejected the proposed construction submitted by plaintiff. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:12 am
Never too late 78  [week ending on Sunday 27 December] – Zer-sum claim and lookalike products | 2015 Copyright Awards | Santa Claus and Section 52 | Jani writes on Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited | IP Hairballs |  Actavis v Eli Lilly | Power outage at USPTO | Santa's GC resigns | Pet rock and IP.Never too late 77 [week ending on Sunday 20 December] – GC on 5-stripe shoe mark | EPO BoA… [read post]