Search for: "American Federation of Government Employees v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 1,861
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Sri Medicherla
Kim stated that the bill is meant to ensure greater transparency over defense contractors and “make sure that Americans know our defense force has their backs. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 7:05 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Respondent’s arguments The United States argues that Kloeckner is inapposite to this case. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 1:30 pm by Marty Lederman
System Federation, 300 U.S. 515, 552 (1937); see also Trump v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 4:00 am by Joseph A. Devall, Jr.
That case, which is now before the 2012–2013 session of the United States Supreme Court, started out with the City of Riviera Beach, Florida, attempting to evict Mr. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:36 am by LindaMBeale
[Warning to readers--only peripherally about tax] In January of 2010 in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-7739. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” In a brief per curiam decision, the justices also dismissed United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:58 am
A question raised, but not answered — since the defendant didn’t argue it — in Judge Neil Gorsuch’s characteristically scholarly opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 6:59 am by Rich McHugh
Alternatively, the court stated that the federal government simply could pay for contraceptive coverage with a subsidy (although it is unclear whether that approach would be possible without enabling legislation). [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:10 am by Amy Howe
In 2012, a federal district court drew new maps for the election that year; the state legislature adopted those maps the following year. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:11 am by Rich McHugh
  If a state chooses not to do so, the federal government is required to assume that responsibility. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It was designed to avoid the tyranny that results from accumulations of power by dividing power centers, including the branches of government, the states and federal government, and the union of power between church and state. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 (16-1466), takes the opposite position from DOJ’s amicus brief filed two years earlier, in Friedrichs v California Teachers Association (14-915), to argue that it is time to overturn Abood v. [read post]