Search for: "Apotex"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2008, 6:28 pm
Apotex. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
In November, 2010 Apotex paid into court US$556 million in respect of the judgment. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:15 am
Alcon has not initiated litigation against Apotex but did initiate litigation against Mylan and Micro Labs after Apotex filed its IPRs. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
As would be expected, Apotex (generic2) successfully requested that at least a portion of Allergan’s court materials in case1 be filed publicly, prior to the filing of Apotex’s factum. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 1:43 am
The defendants (Apotex) belonged to a group of Canadian generic pharma companies. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:07 am
Apotex triggered Pfizer's pediatric exclusivity. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 12:55 pm
” Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 9:59 pm
Apotex argued unsuccessfully that Dr. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 10:48 am
In an earlier ruling, Judge Stein tipped his hand, saying the brand-name drugmakers would likely prevail in their patent-infringement lawsuit against Apotex. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 2:51 pm
Apotex Lipitor: Pfizer v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
At the Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones Newswire’s Kristina Peterson addresses the Court’s denial of cert. in a drug-patent dispute between generic drug manufacturer Apotex Corp. and patent-holders Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb, while the Associated Press has coverage of the Court’s decision not to hear an appeal to stop the release of documents relating to sexual abuse lawsuits against Roman Catholic priests in Connecticut. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 8:59 pm
Apotex; v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:47 am
The first called for a series of "reverse payments" by Sanofi to Apotex, also guaranteeing that neither Apotex nor Sanofi would launch a generic during Apotex's exclusivity period. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:03 am
See Apotex, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Apotex Inc., 2013 FC 751, Justice Snider held that Apotex must pay $119 million in damages for its sale of generic lovastatin, a cholesterol drug, which infringed one of Merck’s patents. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 10:57 am
Apotex in 2005, IPBiz noted:The CAFC in Rasmusson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 9:52 pm
Mutual Zantac Syrup: Apotex v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 12:43 pm
5 Jul 2016, 12:43 pm
11 Oct 2010, 9:45 pm
Apotex, where the court determined there was not. [read post]
