Search for: "Baker v. U.S. District Court" Results 401 - 420 of 775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
That cross-appeal was Baker, et al., v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held; -- WesternGeco v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 1:36 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Orin Kerr analyzed an Eastern District of Virginia judge’s ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:48 pm
Her friendly advice on how to be a good appellate court: (1) Do not ignore controlling Supreme Court decisions (see U.S. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
Condo owners lost on summary judgment in the District Court in Houston (case info here) and took their beef to the Court of Appeal, which affirmed. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am by Bexis
 As a federal district court charged with applying Texas law under the Erie doctrine, the Southern District of Texas was bound to follow:  (1) decisions of the Texas Supreme Court, and (2) predictions of Texas law made by the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 1:13 pm by Eric Quitugua
District Court, Western District of Texas. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 1:13 pm by Eric Quitugua
District Court, Western District of Texas. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:18 pm by Christiana Wayne
The Supreme Court upheld Arizona voting restrictions in Brnovich v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday evening the Supreme Court, at the request of North Carolina Republicans, agreed to put a hold on a lower-court order to redraw the state’s congressional districts, which the lower court had invalidated as an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. [read post]
22 May 2019, 8:14 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Vishnu Kannan
Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York on Thursday, July 19. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:03 am
Chiles, 680 So. 2d 400, 407 (Fla. 1996), for the proposition that the amended complaint raises only nonjusticiable “political” questions, see Baker v. [read post]