Search for: "Brown v. State Bar" Results 401 - 420 of 1,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2014, 5:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" Where these three factors are present, this issue should be addressed by a criminal court as an exception to the mootness doctrine as held in People v Brown, People v Mejia, Matter of Crystal AA and Wagner v Infante. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm by Ilya Somin
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com)On Monday, the Supreme Court held oral argument in Murthy v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am by Mark Walsh
  I am close to the Kansas group, and I ask them what they think of efforts to rename Brown v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Held over from a week or two back when there were still “campuses” (a joke on that): Not just California: mandatory diversity statements (“diversity oath”) examples in recent hiring from Ohio State, U. of Connecticut, Purdue, Cornell [John Cochrane, earlier] Disturbing: Canadian bioethicist says “possible solution” to conscience-rights debate is to bar persons with scruples against participating in medically assisted death or abortion from… [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
Brown (06-939), involving whether states may bar employers from using public money to influence the outcome of union organizing campaigns. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 11:39 am by The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.
The recent law, signed by that state’s Governor Jerry Brown, allows a penalty of up to three years’ prison time for prosecutors who withhold evidence that defendants could use to exonerate them. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 2:04 pm
In the decisions on workplace issues, these were the results,  in summary: ** Federal labor law bars a state from curbing the rights of employers to speak out about labor union organizing by their workers. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm by Ilya Somin
As explained in our amicus brief and my first post about this case, the Supreme Court had already signaled such a Catch-22 barring takings claims from federal court is impermissible in its 2019 ruling in Knick v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
In a post earlier today, guest-blogger Mike Paulsen suggests that a cert. petition currently pending before the Supreme Court is redolent of such landmark race-discrimination cases as Brown v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
In a post earlier today, guest-blogger Mike Paulsen suggests that a cert. petition currently pending before the Supreme Court is redolent of such landmark race-discrimination cases as Brown v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 3:10 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
One reviewer of the episode wrote: Perry cites a real case, State v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:17 am
The Utah Supreme Court has reminded the bar in McKelvey v. [read post]