Search for: "CF-3" Results 401 - 420 of 2,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm by James Eckert
Here, neither risk factor was originally selected on the RAI or raised by the People at the SORA hearing, and defendant learned of the assessment of the additional points for the first time when the court issued its decision (cf. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 8:19 am by J
There is also a power to amend a s.13 notice (with the permission of the court) – see Sch.3. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Moreover, the added feature limits the subject-matter of independent claim 1 of the previous auxiliary request 4 in a direction that corresponds to the disclosed inventive idea (cf. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 8:07 am
In addition, the EEA factually also limits jurisprudential independence, because the EFTA Court in practice follows the CJEU’s case law (see also Art. 106 EEA Agreement) and because the CJEU in the EEA Agreement is accorded an indirect decisional competence of last resort in the event of diverging case law (see Arts. 105 (3) and 111 (3) EEA Agreement). [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 1:00 am by Marcel Pemsel
It also reflects the cosmopolitan nature of the city of Berlin. 3. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
However, this interpretation contradicts the very purpose of A 122 (cf. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:37 pm by Eleonora Rosati
In other words, in Italy the obligation for ISPs to act “…. expeditiously to remove or to disable access to the information…” does not arise at the time when an ISP obtains knowledge or becomes aware of illegal activities or infringing content occurring on its servers (cf Article 14 of the e-Commerce directive). [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
Times, Dec. 8, 2002, section 1, p. 1, col. 3 (describing admissions process at Rice University); cf. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:49 am
Organised and hosted by ATRIP president - the learned and charming Professor Graeme Dinwoodie - this 3-day conference was devoted to answering the following question: Is Intellectual Property a Lex Specialis? [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
No reasons were given for justifying the introduction of this objection in appeal proceedings under A 100(b) and/or for explaining why it could not have been submitted in an earlier stage of the proceedings. [3] In its communication pursuant to Article 15(1) RPBA, the board – with reference to the function of an appeal proceedings as established in the case law (cf. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:09 am
Coach Servs., 668 F.3d at 1376 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); cf. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 2:08 am
  There is also an argument that the decision could devalues EUTMs in favour of national trade marks as these would theoretically allow a recourse via Article 5(3) Brussels Regulation. [read post]